<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

High diagnostic accuracy of a resnet50-based deep learning model for osteochondral lesions of the talus on magnetic resonance imaging

dc.contributor.authorDabiry, Sultan Mujib
dc.contributor.authorDemirtas, Yunus
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Tugrul
dc.contributor.authorAyik, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorCakmak, Gokhan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-09T21:53:40Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a ResNet50-based convolutional neural network (CNN) in detecting osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to compare its efficacy between T1-and T2-weighted sequences. Materials and methods: A total of 219 ankle MRI scans were reviewed retrospectively, including 60 with confirmed OLTs and 159 without lesions. From each study, coronal and sagittal T1-and T2-weighted images were extracted and standardized to 224 & times; 224 pixels. Augmentation techniques were applied to strengthen model training. Data were divided into training, validation, and test sets in a 60:20:20 split. A ResNet50 model initialized with ImageNet weights was fine-tuned using cross-entropy loss with class weighting. Diagnostic performance was summarized with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-scores. Results: The model performed better on T1 sequences, achieving an accuracy of 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-97.1%) and an area under the curve [AUC] of 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.97), with patient cases classified at 0.92 precision and 0.82 recall. Healthy controls in the T1 group were recognized with 0.95 precision and 0.98 recall. In contrast, T2 sequences were less reliable, showing an accuracy of 87.2% (95% CI 80.5-91.9%) and an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.95). Precision for patient cases in the T2 group was notably lower (0.65) despite a recall of 0.81. Misclassifications were more frequent in the T2 dataset, as evidenced by the confusion matrices. Conclusion: Even with a relatively modest dataset, the ResNet50 model delivered strong results for T1-weighted MRI. While T2 images proved more challenging, suggesting that deep learning can add value to routine assessment of OLTs.
dc.identifier.doi10.52312/jdrs.2026.2719
dc.identifier.endpage551
dc.identifier.issn2687-4792
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid41906849
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105034585196
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage543
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2026.2719
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12794/4034
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001733439300027
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynak.digerScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Joint Diseases Foundation
dc.relation.ispartofJoint Diseases and Related Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260922
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence
dc.subjectDeep Learning
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectOsteochondral Lesions Of Talus
dc.subjectResnet50
dc.titleHigh diagnostic accuracy of a resnet50-based deep learning model for osteochondral lesions of the talus on magnetic resonance imaging
dc.typeArticle

Files