<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Intracortical brain-computer interfaces for improved motor function: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorHolt, Matthew W.
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Eric C.
dc.contributor.authorShlobin, Nathan A.
dc.contributor.authorHanson, Jacob T.
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Ismail
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-09T21:51:23Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIn this systematic review, we address the status of intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) applied to the motor cortex to improve function in patients with impaired motor ability. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines for Systematic Reviews. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) were used to assess bias and quality. Advances in iBCIs in the last two decades demonstrated the use of iBCI to activate limbs for functional tasks, achieve neural typing for communication, and other applications. However, the inconsistency of performance metrics employed by these studies suggests the need for standardization. Each study was a pilot clinical trial consisting of 1-4, majority male (64.28 %) participants, with most trials featuring participants treated for more than 12 months (55.55 %). The systems treated patients with various conditions: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, spinocerebellar degeneration without cerebellar involvement, and spinal cord injury. All participants presented with tetraplegia at implantation and were implanted with microelectrode arrays via pneumatic insertion, with nearly all electrode locations solely at the precentral gyrus of the motor cortex (88.88 %). The development of iBCI devices using neural signals from the motor cortex to improve motor-impaired patients has enhanced the ability of these systems to return ability to their users. However, many milestones remain before these devices can prove their feasibility for recovery. This review summarizes the achievements and shortfalls of these systems and their respective trials.
dc.description.sponsorshipSpecial thanks to Justin Campbell for his insight, edits, and advice.
dc.description.sponsorshipSpecial thanks to Justin Campbell for his insight, edits, and advice.
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/revneuro-2023-0077
dc.identifier.endpage223
dc.identifier.issn0334-1763
dc.identifier.issn2191-0200
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2079-6125
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6719-5522
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0007-8230-0603
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4060-2391
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1632-7705
dc.identifier.pmid37845811
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85175428361
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage213
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2023-0077
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12794/3829
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001085470500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynak.digerScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter Gmbh
dc.relation.ispartofReviews in the Neurosciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.relation.sdgGoal-03: Good Health and Well-Being
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260922
dc.subjectBrain-Computer Interface
dc.subjectBrain-Machine Interface
dc.subjectImplant
dc.subjectMotor Cortex
dc.subjectIntracortical
dc.titleIntracortical brain-computer interfaces for improved motor function: a systematic review
dc.typeReview Article

Files