<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Is fluoroscopy necessary during flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of renal stones?

dc.contributor.authorKirac, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKopru, Burak
dc.contributor.authorErgin, Giray
dc.contributor.authorKibar, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorBiri, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-09T21:49:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) without fluoroscopy during the treatment of renal stones. Patients and methods: Between April 2013 and August 2018, 744 patients' data were evaluated retrospectively. Of these, 576 patients were included in the study. All fURS were performed by experienced surgeons. All procedures were planned with zero-dose fluoroscopy. But, if fluoroscopy was necessary for any reasons, these patients were excluded from the study. Demographic data, perioperative parameters, stone-free rate (SFR), and complication rates were recorded. Results: Of the patients planned for fluoroless fURS (ffURS), the procedure was successfully achieved in 96.7% (557/576 patients), as 19 patients required fluoroscopy during the procedure for various reasons. In the patients included in the study, the mean (SD) stone size was 11.6 (5.2) mm and the mean (SD) operating time was 39.4 (8.2) min. After the first session of ffURS, the SFR was 83.3% (achieved in 464 patients). Second and third sessions of ffURS were performed in 32 (5.7%) and seven (1.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, the complication rate was 11.8% and all complications were minor (Clavien-Dindo Grade I or II). Conclusions: The ffURS technique seems to be a safe and effective treatment compared to conventional fURS in patients with renal stones. This procedure should be performed in experienced centers, where fluoroscopy can be considered not to be mandatory during fURS.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/2090598X.2019.1702242
dc.identifier.endpage117
dc.identifier.issn2090-598X
dc.identifier.issn2090-5998
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6053-144X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0364-7347
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076933884
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage112
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1702242
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12794/3651
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000504070100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynak.digerEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofArab Journal of Urology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.relation.sdgGoal-03: Good Health and Well-Being
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260922
dc.subjectFluoroless
dc.subjectRadiation
dc.subjectRenal Stone
dc.subjectFlexible Ureteroscopy
dc.subjectStone Treatment
dc.titleIs fluoroscopy necessary during flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of renal stones?
dc.typeArticle

Files