<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy

dc.contributor.authorErgin, Giray
dc.contributor.authorDoluoglu, Omer Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorKirac, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Muhammet Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKopru, Burak
dc.contributor.authorKeseroglu, Bugra Bilge
dc.contributor.authorHoscan, Mustafa Burak
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-09T21:51:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the effect of robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) on early renal function in this study. Materials and Methods: Preoperative and postoperative urea, creatinine, Hb, eGFR values of patients who had undergone RALP and RRP with prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis were recorded in our clinic. The percentages of change in these values are calculated. Preoperative and postoperative urea, creatinine, Hb and eGFR changes were compared with each other. Student-t test was used for intergroup comparison, and paired sample t test was used to compare changes between preoperative and postoperative values of the same group. Results: There were 160 and 93 patients in the RALP and RRP group, respectively. In the RALP group, postoperative urea and creatinine increased significantly compared to preoperative baseline values while eGFR was decreased (p = 0.0001, p = 0.001, p = 0.0001, respectively). Except for Hb in the RRP group, the changes in these values were statistically insignificant (p = 0.50, p = 0.75, p = 0.30, respectively). Conclusions: We should be more careful when we perform RALP in patients at risk of impaired renal function despite being a minimally invasive surgical method with superior visual characteristics.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0103
dc.identifier.endpage88
dc.identifier.issn1677-5538
dc.identifier.issn1677-6119
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2515-7106
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6053-144X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1124-2462
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1744-0200
dc.identifier.pmid29757580
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85062851377
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage83
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0103
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12794/3839
dc.identifier.volume45
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000459340200013
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynak.digerScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBrazilian Soc Urol
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Braz J Urol
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.relation.sdgGoal-03: Good Health and Well-Being
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260922
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms
dc.subjectProstatectomy
dc.subjectVideo-Assisted Surgery
dc.titleComparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
dc.typeArticle

Files