<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Comparison of endoscopic and open saphenous vein harvesting: Impact on postoperative in-hospital outcomes

dc.contributor.authorKırali, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorAksüt, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorHancer, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorOzgur, Mustafa Mert
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Tanıl
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Ahmet Mirza
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-09T21:23:16Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness, technical feasibility, and potential benefits associated with endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting. Patients and methods: This study included a total of 122 patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery with saphenous vein grafts between January 2022 and March 2023. Fifty-six (44 males, 12 females; mean age: 62.5±8.6 years; range, 43 to 77 years) of the patients were assigned to the endoscopic harvesting group, while 66 patients (57 males, 9 females; mean age: 60.1±9.1 years; range, 42 to 81 years) were assigned to the open harvesting group. This study compares endoscopic saphenous harvesting and open technique in terms of clinical implications, including wound healing and clinical recovery and patients' pain experiences. Results: Among the comorbidities evaluated, the prevalence of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups. There were no reported cases of graft branch complications, graft-related bleeding, or graft thrombosis in either group. However, the occurrence of wound discharge was significantly lower in the endoscopic group (0%) compared to the open group (13.6%). Patients who underwent endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting also experienced less pain and had a significantly lower incidence of keloid scar formation at the wound site. Both groups had comparable rates of debridement, while systemic infection was observed in 0% of the endoscopic group and 1.5% of the open group. Wound site infection was lower in the endoscopic group (0%) compared to the open group (4.5%). The length of hospital stay in the ward did not show a significant difference between the two groups. However, the time required for wound dressing was significantly shorter in the endoscopic group compared to the open group. Conclusion: These findings suggest potential advantages of endoscopic surgery in terms of reduced postoperative complications and faster wound healing.
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/e-cvsi.2023.1554
dc.identifier.endpage153
dc.identifier.issn2148-9211
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage147
dc.identifier.trdizinid1226674
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5606/e-cvsi.2023.1554
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1226674
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12794/1418
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofCardiovascular surgery and interventions
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_TR-Dizin_20260922
dc.subjectTıbbi Araştırmalar Deneysel
dc.subjectKalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemi
dc.subjectCerrahi
dc.titleComparison of endoscopic and open saphenous vein harvesting: Impact on postoperative in-hospital outcomes
dc.typeArticle

Files