<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Endo/epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias with contact force-sensing catheters in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy

dc.contributor.authorKara, Meryem
dc.contributor.authorCay, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorÖzeke, Özcan
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Firat
dc.contributor.authorTopaloglu, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorAras, Dursun
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-09T21:15:09Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: To control ventricular arrhythmia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C), ablation may be requiredboth from the endocardial and epicardial side. In this study, we analyzed the results of contact force–sensing (CFS) catheters in the endo/epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in ARVD/C.Methods: We included 17 patients with ARVD/C, 5 of whom had premature ventricular contractions (PVC), and the rest of them were admittedwith a ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm, between September 2014 and October 2016. We divided patients into two groups: the PVC and VTgroups. Irrigated CFS catheters (Smart Touch, Biosense Webster, Inc.) were utilized in all procedures.Results: In the PVC group, the mean ratio of PVC during the 24-hour Holter monitoring was 31.8±7.6%. The mean contact force during mappingand ablation in the right ventricle was 13±1.2 and 12.8±1.9 grams, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 15±3.1 months for the PVCgroup. The left ventricular ejection fraction improved in all patients (52.8±10%). All patients in the VT group underwent endo/epicardial ablation,except one. The mean contact force during the endocardium and epicardium mapping was 12.5±1.2 and 12.5±4.6 grams, respectively. The meancontact force during ablation for the endocardium and epicardium was 12.1±1.4 and 12.8±1.9 grams, respectively. All clinical and non-clinical VTswere ablated successfully, except in 2 patients who still had non-clinical VTs. The mean follow-up was 15.5±4.5 months. None of the VT patientsexperienced electrical storm or death. Two patients had single shock, and 1 patient had two shocks during the follow-up.Conclusion: Endo/epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias with CFS catheters in ARVD/C seems to be promising. (Anatol J Cardiol 2019;21: 187-95)
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.58534
dc.identifier.endpage195
dc.identifier.issn2149-2263
dc.identifier.issn2149-2271
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage187
dc.identifier.trdizinid342629
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.58534
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/342629
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12794/649
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_TR-Dizin_20260922
dc.subjectGenel ve Dahili Tıp
dc.titleEndo/epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias with contact force-sensing catheters in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy
dc.typeArticle

Files