<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Mean S1 inlet and outlet view angles are not safe for all individuals according to three-dimensional tomographic measurements

dc.contributor.authorTanoglu, Oguzhan
dc.contributor.authorGokgoz, Mehmet Burak
dc.contributor.authorSubasi, Izzet Ozay
dc.contributor.authorArican, Gokhun
dc.contributor.authorKockara, Nizamettin
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-09T21:46:41Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAlthough there are many studies evaluating optimal inlet and outlet angles required for the correct placement of S1 iliosacral screws, there is no study evaluating reliability and feasibility of these angles for all individuals on three-dimensional (3D) anatomical models. A total of 100 women and 100 men were selected randomly. A vertical line was created according to long axis of the tomography device on which patient was lying in supine position. The automatized best-fit planes were created on superior and inferior endplates, anterior cortex including notch region and posterior cortex of first sacral vertebrae using 3D imaging software to measure mean inlet and outlet angles. We observed no statistically significant difference between gender groups in terms of inlet and outlet angles. Mean inlet view is obtained for anterior cortex of S1 in 22.5 +/- 9.5(degrees) and for posterior cortex in 46.5 +/- 9.3(degrees). Mean fluoroscopic view angle of S1 for superior outlet is 40.3 +/- 7.6 and for inferior outlet is 46.9 +/- 8.8. Mean anterior and posterior S1 inlet view angles do not accurately visualize anterior cortex of 74 (37%) and posterior cortex of 66 (33%) individuals. Mean superior and inferior S1 outlet view angles do not accurately visualize superior endplate of 74 (37%) and inferior endplate of 56 (28%) individuals. Due to individual alterations of spatial position of sacrum, mean inlet and outlet view angles of S1 are not sufficient to visualize the iliosacral screws under fluoroscopy in many individuals.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jor.25701
dc.identifier.endpage677
dc.identifier.issn0736-0266
dc.identifier.issn1554-527X
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1726-7145
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1780-0074
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0758-5382
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8984-9008
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8647-5853
dc.identifier.pmid37804215
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174017811
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage671
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25701
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12794/3402
dc.identifier.volume42
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001085462700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynak.digerScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orthopaedic Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.relation.sdgGoal-03: Good Health and Well-Being
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260922
dc.subjectComputer-Assisted Image Processing
dc.subjectFracture Fixation
dc.subjectSacrum
dc.subjectThree-Dimensional Imaging
dc.subjectTomography
dc.titleMean S1 inlet and outlet view angles are not safe for all individuals according to three-dimensional tomographic measurements
dc.typeArticle

Files