<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants of Unknown Significance in a Turkish Cohort; A Single-Center, Retrospective Study

dc.contributor.authorOzer, Leyla
dc.contributor.authorAktuna, Suleyman
dc.contributor.authorUnsal, Evrim
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-09T21:52:56Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Accurate classification of breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA)1/2 variants is important to delineate candidates for surgical or medical treatment. We retrospectively analyzed BRCA1/BRCA2 sequencing data and reclassified the BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance (VUS) in Turkish patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancers. Materials and Methods: BRCA1/BRCA2 sequence data of a large cohort were retrospectively analyzed. The sequencing data were reinterpreted in the context of American College of Medical Genetics guidelines, the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles BRCA1/2 classification rules, and current public genomic databases. Results: Among the total of 2,713 patients, 254 (9.36%) had BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants. A total of 264 BRCA1/BRCA2 variants were detected. Of these, 130 (49.2%) were pathogenic variants (PV), 24 (9%) were likely pathogenic (LP) and 110 of 264 variants (41.6%) were VUS. For the 119 BRCA1 variants, 68% (n = 81) were PV, 7.5% (n = 9) were LP, and 24.5% (n = 29) were VUS. Similarly, for the 145 BRCA2 variants, 33.7% (n = 49) were PV, 10.3% (n = 15) were LP, and 55.8% (n = 81) were VUS. Reanalysis of the 110 BRCA1+BRCA2 VUS variants led to 22 (20%) being reclassified. Of these 22, 45.4% (n = 10) were reclassified as P/LP and 54.6% (n = 12) were reclassified as benign/likely benign. Conclusion: These results show that it may be possible to reclassify VUS, in this case BRCA1/2 VUS, in light of changing genetic data. These results demonstrate the importance of VUS reclassification of BRCA1/2 variants in clinical management, surgical decisions, risk counseling and screening.
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-5-2
dc.identifier.endpage300
dc.identifier.issn2587-0831
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105017257515
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage295
dc.identifier.trdizinid1343678
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-5-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1343678
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12794/3971
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001581967500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynak.digerEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Publ House
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Breast Health
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.relation.sdgGoal-03: Good Health and Well-Being
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260922
dc.subjectBrca1 And Brca2 Genes
dc.subjectBreast Cancer Screening
dc.subjectBreast Conserving Surgery
dc.subjectParp Inhibitors
dc.subjectSequencing
dc.titleReclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants of Unknown Significance in a Turkish Cohort; A Single-Center, Retrospective Study
dc.typeArticle

Files