<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

The Impact of laparoscopic surgery of peritoneal endometriosis and endometrioma on the outcome of ICSI cycles

dc.contributor.authorGuler, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorOguz, Yuksel
dc.contributor.authorCevher, Funda
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Mehmet Firat
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Nuray
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-09T21:49:18Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractOur objective was to assess the role of laparoscopic removal of ovarian endometriomas and ablation of peritoneal endometriosis on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) Embryo Transfer cycles by comparing with the results of patients with untreated endometriomas and tubal factor without underlying endometriosis confirmed by laparoscopy. For this purpose, between 2002 and 2015, outcomes of 257 ICSI cycles of 150 patients, including 91 cycles of 48 patients in minimal endometriosis, 57 cycles of 25 patients in endometrioma removal, 65 cycles of 53 patients in non-operated endometrioma, and 44 cycles of 24 patients in tubal factor groups were retrospectively analyzed. Basal ovarian reserve was significantly lower, mean starting and total gonadotropin consumption was significantly higher, and mean serum E2 on the day of hCG injection, number of dominant follicles, number of retrieved total, and MII oocytes were all significantly lower in the endometrioma cystectomy group. Fertilization and embryo cleavage rates were also significantly the lowest in the endometrioma cystectomy group, whereas clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were comparable among all groups. The number of transferred embryos and duration of infertility were the most significant predictors of clinical pregnancy and live birth. Basal antral follicle count was also significant in predicting live birth.
dc.description.sponsorshipGazi University
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank Gazi University for the support of this study.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/19396368.2017.1332114
dc.identifier.endpage330
dc.identifier.issn1939-6368
dc.identifier.issn1939-6376
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8098-2483
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9944-6894
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6019-6429
dc.identifier.pmid28609124
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85020700884
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage324
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2017.1332114
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12794/3647
dc.identifier.volume63
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000409557100006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynak.digerScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc
dc.relation.ispartofSystems Biology in Reproductive Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.relation.sdgGoal-03: Good Health and Well-Being
dc.relation.sdgGoal-05: Gender Equality
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260922
dc.subjectEndometrioma
dc.subjectIntracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
dc.subjectLaparoscopy
dc.subjectPeritoneal Endometriosis
dc.subjectTubal Factor
dc.titleThe Impact of laparoscopic surgery of peritoneal endometriosis and endometrioma on the outcome of ICSI cycles
dc.typeArticle

Files