<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Comparison of post-operative outcomes of graft materials used in reconstruction of blow-out fractures

dc.contributor.authorDuzgun, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorSirkeci, Bahar Kayahan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-09T21:51:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Trauma to the face caused by assault or impact may cause internal orbital fracture. Increased intraorbital pressure without disruption of soft tissue integrity or causing a fracture line in orbital rims or orbital floor fractures described as orbital blowout fracture. Such fractures have been categorized as pure blow-out fractures in which only the orbital floor is affected, and impure blow-out fractures in which other maxillofacial bones such as zygoma, maxilla and nasoethmoid are also affected. Physical examination reveals periorbital edema and ecchymosis, subconjunctival hemorrhage, limitation of eye globe movements, diplopia, enophthalmos, dystopia, and infraorbital hypoesthesia. Reconstruction of the orbital bony structures is the most important issue to preserve the standard orbital functions and providing an aesthetic view. Although many surgical approaches have been defined in the literature regarding the attitude and timing of treatment, no consensus exists. In literature; many autogenous and alloplastic biomaterials have been recommended to correct orbital bone defects. METHODS: This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes of patients presenting with pure and impure blow-out fractures repaired with cartilage, bone grafts, titanium mesh or porous polyethylene implant. Sixty-four orbital floor fractures of 62 cases were included in this research who admitted to our clinic with maxillofacial trauma between 2011 and 2018. All patients underwent maxillofacial radiological examination; Waters radiography and also axial-coronal plane maxillofacial and orbital computerized tomography. RESULTS: Permanent, post-operative, vertical diplopia in extreme gazes was detected in 3 of 14 patients in whom the orbital floor was reconstructed with an iliac bone graft. Two of nineteen cases who underwent reconstruction using auricular conchal cartilage graft had vertical diplopia in extreme gazes four months after the operation. The implant extruded and became palpable in 2 of 15 patients in the porous polyethylene implant group. None of the patients in the iliac bone and conchal cartilage autograft groups was presented late postoperative enophthalmos according to the graft resorption. In titanium mesh group, 1 of eleven patients had permanent, postoperative vertical diplopia in extreme gazes. None of the patients in this group developed any donor area complications, infection, or implant extrusion. CONCLUSION: Results show that the auricular conchal cartilage graft was the best biomaterial used to repair defects smaller than 4 cm(2), where as titanium mesh was a good option to repair defects larger than 4 cm(2). However, selection of the optimal biomaterial to be used to repair orbital blow-out fractures should be made according to patient characteristics and preoperative findings, the severity of the injury, the cost of the biomaterial to be used, and surgeon's expertise.
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/tjtes.2020.80552
dc.identifier.endpage544
dc.identifier.issn1306-696X
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0491-8711
dc.identifier.pmid32589255
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087135927
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage538
dc.identifier.trdizinid367023
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.80552
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/367023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12794/3824
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000580593100007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynak.digerScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Trauma Emergency Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofUlusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.relation.sdgGoal-03: Good Health and Well-Being
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260922
dc.subjectAll-Plastic Biomaterials
dc.subjectAutogenous Grafts
dc.subjectBlow-Out Fractures
dc.titleComparison of post-operative outcomes of graft materials used in reconstruction of blow-out fractures
dc.title.alternativeBlow-out fraktürleri onarımında kullanılan greft materyallerinin ameliyat sonrası sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması
dc.typeArticle

Files